• Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Recent Publications
  • RSS
Subscribe: Posts | Comments | E-mail
  • Be ProfitableMarket, sell and get paid.
  • FeaturesGuests and other goodies.
  • MeMy work, life and shameless self-promotion.
  • ToolsHelpful Tools to ply our Trade.
  • WritingWriting is what we do.

MLV WritesBlog of Monica Valentinelli, Writer & Content Consultant

Posted on January 24, 2008 - by Monica Valentinelli

System vs. Setting in Game Design

Game Design + Writing

One of the biggest arguments I’ve heard over the past, few years is, “Does system matter more than setting?”

The answer is, “Both do.”

Here’s why:

Game mechanics, for any platform (PC, video, tabletop or card game) handles the pacing of the game, attributing to its mood or what I call “game aura.” If you’re creating a “fast-paced zombie hunting game” for example, your mechanics should facilitate that feel. A good example of relevant mechanics is the card game Gloom, which was produced by Atlas Games. In this game, your goal is to make your “family” as miserable as possible. Whoever dies first, in the most horrific way possible, wins. Now, this game may sound truly terrifying but the art and the writing of the game give it an Edward Gorey-like feel, building the setting.

The mechanics are really inventive; you have see-through cards with points that stack on top of one another. In this way, the mechanics allow you to “make” your family member miserable by directly placing modifiers on top of your character. Hence, the mood is not detracted and the overall feel of the game remains intact.

Another good example of mechanics is the exceedingly popular Star Wars: Legos series. Star Wars, a science fantasy setting, is taken to a humorous level by playing off of the Legos setting. The mechanics are simple because they needed to be; who wants to “build” characters through stats if you’re playing Legos?

“New” game mechanics from upcoming or independent publishers are not as integrated with their setting, in many cases, because game designers often strip out the system to playtest it and make sure the system works. If your system has a “theme,” (i.e. fast-paced, larger-than-life), then this can be a good idea. If it doesn’t, you may want to “test” different parts of your game with the mechanics to ensure that the pacing and flow is not interrupted by say, your vampire needing to feed before making it through your next scene (Bloodrayne).

So if you are working on game mechanics, there are really two questions that are important for you to ask: One, does this system work with the game I’m designing and two, have I tested it in all of its forms to ensure it doesn’t interrupt the flow of the game.

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 24th, 2008 at 5:49 am and is filed under Game Design + Writing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

0 Comments

We'd love to hear yours!



Leave a Reply


Here's your chance to speak.

Click here to cancel reply.

  1. Name (required)

    Mail (required)

    Website

    Message

  • My Recent Releases

    The Queen of Crows


    Download THE QUEEN OF CROWS e-book at DriveThruHorror.com


    Family Games: The 100 Best


    Pre-Order at Amazon.com


    Buried Tales of Pinebox, TX


    Available at Amazon.com

    Available at DriveThruHorror.com
  • Current Project

  • Where in the World is Monica?

      follow me on Twitter
    • The Archive

    © 2008 MLV Writes - Blog of Monica Valentinelli, Writer & Content Consultant